Samyang´s new lenses for RF Mount... the MF 85mm f1.4

March 09, 2019  •  Leave a Comment

Background of the review

After my first experience with the Canon EOS R the lens choice seems to be too heavy to travel with... The combo of Canon´s great EF 85_L-IS monster and the even heavier Milvus 15mm f2.8 let me ask Samyang: will you come up with something light being designed for Canon´s RF mount? The reply was astonishing: Yes we do, we checked your profile on social media: would you like to review the lenses. Since I like to test glass -you always learn from it- I agreed. I took quite a bit and some communication with German customs I finally got the lenses from Samyang, the 85mm f1.4 as well as the 14mm f2.8. 



My first reaction: disappointment

My first reaction was disappointment. These lenses do not looks being originally designed for mirrorless cameras. I just looks like a simple mechanical adapter - and even worse- without any EXIF chip build in. Therefore no exif data transferred,  no focusing aid (an awesome tool on the EOS-R!!!) and no focusing wide open and automatic aperture closing. I communicated with Samyang, the replied properly and asked to give it a try. So i did. And please read to the end!

So I made some first tests at home which were astonishing and later I took them on a little trip to South of France to shoot with them there, too.

But let's start with a topic which is important for these kind of lenses:

Manual focusing on the EOS-R without communication to the lens

or: where mirrorless cameras are shining...

Today many people believe that autofocus is essentiell. Well having autofocus can be helpful, but can be annoying, too. I skipped my Sigma 85mm f1.4 because of Autofocus inconsistency. it is no fun if a lens while open doesn't deliver sharp images where it should be sharp. And honestly: on a DSLR shooting manually through the viewfinder without focus confirmation and special focusing screen build in the camera? No fun at all... 

But the EOS R has one feature build in which makes it easy to focus: focus peaking. It was the first time I had to use it exclusively to work with this feature. I was astonished how well it works. The accuracy range was really comparable to autofocus (!)...

The other advantage of focusing with manual focusing lens is the possibility to use the 5x or 10x magnification in the viewfinder. This methods gives you the highest level of focusing accuracy. But in low light you will suffer from the noise in the viewfinder as well...

Generally spoken after using mirrorless cameras since almost 10 years now this type of cameras is much more suited for manual focusing than anything else. Mirrorless cameras - and especially the implementation of Canon - Is really joy to shoot manual focusing lenses. This opens opportunities especially on the budget side - but using lenses like the Milvus or Otus from Zeiss also in the very high end site...

The lens

Build quality

The lens is build pretty properly, it has a metal design for all optics and the mount to the camera, the lens hood and the structure holding the lensed are from solid plastic.


The lens without the lens hood. 


And here the lens in its full size...

The focus throw is around 110º and feels very well damped. This not much, on the other side the minimum focusing distance is only 110cm instead of 85cm for the other 85mm´s I own.

Just for fun I measured minimum focal distance... The result:

  • Samyang 112 cm
  • Canon 83cm
  • Milvus 82cm

Remark Samyang told me that the lens I have tested is a beta-lens. Samyang will change the minimum focal distance to 1 m. This will be a bit better... 

Personally I would like to have it even shorter that 85mm - I would love to have it at a magnification of 0.3....


The aperture range goes from f 1.4 to f22 (yes, the other ones stop @ f16. The aperture stops are typically half stop, bit between f22 and f16 as well as f2 and f1.4 you have only 1 stop. What is nice - and an improvement over my former Samyang lenses that they have an indicator for depth of field. This is handsome and I guess it comes with no extra costs in manufacturing- just another mask for marking....


What amount of glass...


Surprisingly: the lens comes with weather sealing. 

The upper lens cap is good it is easy to grip, even with mounted lens hood.

The lens is pretty compact and lightweight:

  • Samyang MF 85mm f1.4:                   728 g 
  • Canon EF 85mm f1.4 EF L IS USM:    1177 g
  • Zeiss Milvus 85mm f1.4                   1484 g

All lenses I measured with hood and both lens caps. The EF mount lenses were measured including the RF to EF control ring adapter.

What can make you thinking: The EOS R incl the Samyang MF 85mm f1.4 weights 1390g. This is less than the Zeiss Milvus alone....

There are really no complains about build quality: it is a pretty well made lens!

Image quality

Image quality is a topic which comes with a lot of aspects. An 85mm f1.4 should have a at least decent sharpness in the center at f1.4. It should have a buttery smooth bokeh, not too much color fringing and at the end not soo sensitive against lens flare....

To test some of these topics I let this lens compete with 2 strong competitors (definitely not in the price point): The Canon EF 85mm f1.4 L IS USM and the Zeiss Milvus 85mm f1.4


What do you expect from a low cost lens. Not too much, or?

The first comparison starts with some photos taken at different settings. First an overview o the scene:


The photo shows the pretty famous Stuttgart railway station. You can see the construction  work in the center of the scene.

The camera stood on a sturdy tripod. I have chosen 10s delay time for shutter release.

The photos you see below are taken at f 1.4 and f 5.6. You can identify the different lenses according to the name of the lens

  • The Canon lens speaks clear text
  • The Milvus is shown as EOS R 85mm - but it indicates the the f stop at least.

The  photos are screenshots taken left, in the middle and on the right side of the image.There is a little bit of inconsistency in the images because during the course of the photo shoot - they switched off the lights in the construction area.

The photos are 100% screenshots taken in lightroom.

Lethes start with the Samyang vs Zeiss Milvus. The color rendering of both lenses is pretty similar. But the Samyang is definetly softer...


Now the comparison to the Canon. First of all: The Canon is a bit shorter in focal length why the picture details are a little bit different. Due to my taste the difference is a bit less - or in other words: the Milvus shows a bit better performance...


On the left side on the bottom of the tower additionally the Samyang shows more color fringing (chromatic aberrations).

In the comparison between the Samy and the Canon The Canon shows a bit more chromatic aberrations than the Milvus....


In the center of the frame please look at the "LBBW" signs: the Milvus is here really strong..

In the center of the frame we do have the similar impression. For my taste the Samyang has some weakness in terms of lens flare. But for my taste this is acceptable, especially at the price point of the lens.

At f 5.6 the lenses are getting pretty close to each other. 

In this image the lights in the construction area is still on. What you clearly see is that the Milvus has 9 blades vs 8 blades on the Samyang.  

But in terms of sharpness. the lenses are really close!

At f 5.6 color fringing is still there, but well controlled. 

And again - for my taste the Milvus has a little edge over the Canon...


My first photo I took with this lens was the following:

190221_R_0211.jpg190221_R_0211.jpg Nothing special. at shortest distance (Which is 1.1 m and not really exciting, I would prefer 85cm...) But you see a decent sharpness and a buttery smooth bokeh!!! Well: this looks promising.

But it is going to get better...

190221_R_0235-6-7.jpg190221_R_0235-6-7.jpg This is a shot of a little sculpture on the balcony. I used the same setup a bit early for the 35mm shootout (where the Milvus 35mm f1.4 has blown me away.

With these lenses: In detail you see a little bit less sharpness, but the color rendering and the contrast are pretty similar between Milvus and Samyang. The Canon has softer bokehballs, 

But all three lenses: in terms of bokeh: the they are all great!!!

Lens flare

One topic these lenses are not that great is news flare...

I shot some samples handheld


This is f 1.4. For my taste it is ok, I would call it personallity


This shot is f11


But at f22 is gets extrem, quite a lot of artifacts and reflections in the lens...

For me: this is good to know, and normally nobody shoots like that.... 


Real world shooting experience 

After shooting with this lens quite a bit I am pretty excited. This lens is a stunning performer. I took both lenses on a short trip to the Cote d'Azur. And I gave it a try - just the 2 lenses on a short trip to the small city of Cogolin, close to St. Tropez at the Cote d´Azur...

The results should speak for themselves. My first shots I took in the blue hour in the village and on the next morning there was a reportage type of shooting  at the Saturday market. When I had my images ready just when some clouds came up and the very beautiful morning light was gone...


A street in the old town of a typical village in the south of France... 



This shot was just around the corner. It was very windy... what you can imagine because of the flare of the blanket in the foreground....

On the other side this little place is beautifully lightened and the lens shows here  really decent performance...

On the next morning I went to the market place in front of the "Marie", Lord Mayors house...


This little caravan was offering an excellent espresso. Always good to start with...  What amazed me is the dynamic range of the EOS R: the interior as jpg is pretty black...


I did a couple of shots for that was the market has to offer, like vegetable


Or fresh seafood...

Clothes of course - very typic for the mediterranean markets...

The way how  the stuff is presented is important, too. 

And again: whatch the amazing bokeh!!!


And finally the people on the market...

When the sun disappears I was pretty hungry and I went to my favorite bakery for breakfast...

190103_R_0142.jpg190103_R_0142.jpg Warm and fresh baguette from the best bakery on the planet... I am not joking.

The shot is pretty perfectly framed.... and the bokeh gives the rest...

190103_R_0140.jpg190103_R_0140.jpg Clemence, the young lady in the shop... nice and charming....


And amazing food for breakfast...

190103_R_0150.jpg190103_R_0150.jpg My last shot of the balcony... and again the lovely bokeh...

The real world shooting experience was the point which got me. The lens worked much batter than I thought. You can say as well The support the EOS-R gives you for this type of lens is amazing- even if the lens has no communication with the camera...

By the way: all shots at the market were f1.4. For me the sharpness is amazing...

Verdict: Excitement

After first mixed feelings: I am pretty excited about the lens. In terms of the results you get from this lens: it is just wow!!! Very decent images, excellent image quality - if you know how to use the lens. And in terms of useability (nice buttery manual focusing) and weather sealing it is really remarkable.

For whom is this lens for?

  • It is made for owners of the R-Mount cameras - but the EF version will show similar results.
  • Everybody who likes a lightweight high performance lens.
  • When to take the RF Mount version instead of the EF mount? This is a very good question. For my taste: if you have decided to got with the R-Mount and/or you do discontinue with EF Mount: go for it. It is lighter and easier to handle.
  • It is more a lens for enthusiasts, for people who like to shoot manual focus.
  • But manual focus is so much fun to use on the Canon mirrorless cameras....

But the lens has a bit of weaknesses too:

  • It is not native RF: I guess a lens designed for the 54mm bajonett diameter and the short flange distance can be even smaller and lighter
  • I miss an EXIF chip - this would be even better
  • The minimum focal distance: the 1.1m minimum focal distance is a sad thing. There announcement to bring this value down to 1 m will make it a bit better. I would prefer it much shorter, even shorter than the usual 85 mm...
  • Not a real weakness but a wish to the designers @ Samyang: instead of a color mark please but something you can feel that you can mount the lens on the body without looking at it....

But if I look at the lens at a glance:  I give the lens a highly recommended!!!


All Photos werde taken with the EOS R and the Samyang MF 85mm f1.4

Only the product shots were taken with the EOS 5DMkIV with the EF 100mm f2.8 L Macro IS USM.

The sample photos of the lens - and a couple more - you find here.

There is also a link toe the image quality comparison

Please have fun and enjoy.


I got the lenses from Samyang for testing for free. 

There is no money involved. Therefore this is my honest opinion about this lens....





January February March April May June July (2) August (3) September (1) October (1) November (1) December
January (2) February March (1) April May June (1) July August (2) September (2) October November December (1)
January (1) February March April May (1) June (1) July August (1) September October November (1) December
January February (1) March April May June July August September October (2) November (1) December (1)
January February March (1) April (1) May June July August September October November (1) December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December