Full Frame - APS-C - µ43. Which format to choose
Why I do this comparison
Everybody is searching for image quality. Everybody wants to have the best possible image technically. But the better sensor is the bigger - due to many reasons. And one of those reasons comes from the physics: Camera sensors are photon counters.. And if one pixel is larger there are more photons to count... and as more photons are counted the distance to zero becomes larger. And as larger this level is as more informations an image can get. Very simple spoken.
But larger sensors have their drawbacks, too. And one of these drawback is the camera size. Camera size means weight to carry and bag size as well. But not only the camera became larger, the lenses too. A µ43-Equipment fits in each pocket... very simple. A full format camera will need a bag...
My question is: What will I loose when I carry the in little µ43-cameras with me instead of the FullFormat Monsters... So i decided to investigate the commons and the differences.
The basics behind the investigations
When I started writing my blog I compared the bokeh between full format and µ43 at the same settings: http://delightphoto.zenfolio.com/blog/2013/7/fullformat-vs-43-comparison-of-bokeh Here you could see that the depth of field is the clear differentiator...
Basically the comparison is characterized by the so called crop factor: This is the factor you have to multiply the actual focal length to get the full format equivalence.
But this is only half of the truth. The other factor to be considered is the depth of field. This is following the same factor. If I want to get comparable images I do have to multiply the aperture with the crop factor as well:
If I want to get the same impression of a photo in terms of depth of field I will have to compare at comparable levels but in this case I will have to vary the ISO or the shutter speed:
When I look to the sensor performance data there should be a clear difference between the different cameras...
I follow here the systematic of DXO in Paris who perform comparisons of lenses and camera sensors in a very detailed way, based on scientific measurements:
But numbers are not everything...
Evaluating the figures above you see: the sensor score between APS-C and µ43 is pretty close and the difference to FF quite big. The biggest impact you will see in the low light performance but in portrait and and especially landscape the dynamic range looks pretty much the same....
This graph shows signal to noise: A clear winner is the 5D2...
For the Dynamic range At low ISO-Values: all 3 cameras behave similar... The differentiation comes with the higher ISO´s.
The color sensitivity shows a similar behavior for all cameras: a clear winner and to followers which are pretty close.
For the test shoots I have chosen the following set up:
All lenses are excellent, good performers...
Also here are the performance datas available.
No further adjustments were done.
But what does real images will show us???
All images are in the same order: The top shows the Full Format, In the middle You see APS-C and the bottom shows the µ43 image
Handheld Nightshots, ISO 1600, wide open and 1/25s; 1/50s 1/100s
Handheld, ISO 400, wide open and 1/25s; 1/50s 1/100s
Handheld, ISO 200, wide open and 1/200s; 1/400s 1/800s
Do you see major differences? I cannot see it... Why not to choose µ43 generally? Yes, there are differences... and some can come out pretty ugly:
Shot on a tripod, FF/APS-C/µ43 with ISO 400 and f16/f11/f8.... What you see is some refraction patterns at the end of the rays. This is really improved against the first generation of µ43 cameras. What I mean: please look at the image below.
But what you can see as well: there is much more contrast much more information in the left image than in both images right of it - but they are close together...
These photos were shot as JPG at a time i did not shoot RAW, somewhere in 2011. The left image was shot with the 5DMkII and the 28-300mmL from Canon while the right image was shot with a G% and the 14-140mm Mk1 from Panasonic.
Conclusio - if there is one..
First of all: in terms of measurements there are big differences between the different cameras and sensor formats. I will add some more images in the future to differentiate the cameras and sensor sizes.
But this is only have of the truth. We can not compare sensors. We will have to compare lenses and cameras as well. And here comes some bigger differentiators. Handling, build in features speed etc. Just looking at image quality Full Format and m43 would be enough. But for me APS-C comes with the 7D´s. And the 7D´s are really great cameras: Very fast with a great autofocus. I never used my µ43 cameras for sports. I do not have the confidence in the autofocus and the level of control I have shooting with the DSLR´s...
What camera I recommend?
No comments posted.
Recent PostsThe Magic of 35mm Lenses Reviewing the Canon f2.0 IS & L f1.4 II & the Zeiss Milvus f1.4 The Canon EF-M 28mm f3.5 IS STM a unique lens on the market - exclusively for EOS-M! The iPhone 7plus Portrait mode: ingenious or rubbish? Zeiss Milvus 50mm f1.4 vs Canon EF 50mm f1.8 STM: 10x the price and 10x better?! Canon EOS M5: A great mirrorless camera from Canon?! A comparison with µ43 and APS-C DSLR (EOS 7D2) Photokina 2016 Canon EOS 5D Mk IV First hands on impressions Lumix GX80 a pretty high tech camera... µ43 lens shoot out: Leica Summilux f1:1,4 12mm vs Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f1:2.0 Zeiss Milvus 85mm f1.4: Impressions of shooting with a really great lens.